Should England Have Had a Penalty for Challenge on Kane?

A controversial moment in the World Cup round of 16 match between England and DR Congo, where Harry Kane was brought down in the box but no penalty was awarded.

In a tense World Cup round of 16 clash between England and DR Congo, a pivotal moment occurred in the 65th minute that would spark heated debate. England captain Harry Kane received the ball inside the penalty area and attempted to turn and shoot, only to be knocked to the ground by a DR Congo defender. The referee waved play on, ignoring England's appeals for a penalty, and did not consult the VAR monitor. Replays showed that the defender made no contact with the ball and instead collided directly with Kane's body, causing him to lose balance and fall. According to FIFA's laws, such contact in the box that impedes an attacking player's shot is typically considered a foul and a penalty should be awarded. The decision left England players and fans incredulous. England manager Gareth Southgate was visibly furious on the sidelines, gesturing wildly at the officials. After the match, he stated in the press conference: 'It was a clear penalty. I don't understand why the referee didn't make the right call.' Kane also expressed his frustration, saying: 'We should have had a penalty. It would have changed everything. But that's football, we have to accept it.' The incident reignited discussions about the use of VAR in the tournament. Former Premier League referee Mark Clattenburg suggested that the referee's view might have been obstructed, but many argued that with VAR available, the failure to review the incident was a serious oversight. Critics pointed out that referees sometimes avoid using VAR to maintain authority, but at the cost of fairness. The impact of the non-call was immense. At the time, the score was 0-0. Had England been awarded a penalty and converted it, the match dynamics would have shifted dramatically. Instead, DR Congo scored a late goal to win 1-0 and eliminate England from the World Cup. The defeat was a bitter pill for a team that had high hopes for the tournament. This controversy adds to the ongoing debate about VAR's role in football. While technology is meant to correct clear errors, its application remains inconsistent. Some argue that referees should be more willing to use the monitor, while others believe the system needs clearer guidelines. FIFA may need to review its protocols to ensure that such obvious mistakes are avoided in the future. For England, the exit is disappointing, but they must also reflect on their own performance. Failing to score in 90 minutes against DR Congo highlighted a lack of cutting edge in attack. Moving forward, the team needs to improve its finishing under pressure and not rely solely on refereeing decisions to determine their fate.

Should England Have Had a Penalty for Challenge on Kane?

Related Matches