Germany goal should have been ruled out for 'endangering opponent'

BBC Sport World Cup pundits Joe Hart, Ellen White and Lucas Leiva explain why Alexander Pavlovic's high boot in the build-up to Leroy Sane's goal was an example of 'endangering the opponent' and should have been disallowed.

In a recent World Cup match, Germany's goal sparked significant controversy. BBC Sport pundits—former England goalkeeper Joe Hart, former England striker Ellen White, and ex-Liverpool midfielder Lucas Leiva—unanimously agreed that the goal should have been disallowed due to a dangerous high boot from Alexander Pavlovic in the buildup. Around the 30th minute, Germany launched a quick counterattack. Pavlovic, contesting an aerial ball, raised his right foot dangerously high, with his studs aimed toward the head of an opposing defender. Although he did not make contact, the motion was clearly reckless. The ball then fell to Leroy Sane, who calmly slotted it into the net. Joe Hart commented: 'This is a very dangerous action. Regardless of whether contact is made, a high boot that endangers an opponent should be penalized. The referee and VAR should have intervened to disallow the goal.' Ellen White added: 'In football, player safety is paramount. Pavlovic's action perfectly fits the definition of endangering an opponent. Disallowing the goal would have been the correct decision.' Lucas Leiva offered a tactical perspective: 'High boots like this are not uncommon, but they are usually called as fouls. If the referee misses it, VAR should step in. The fact that the goal stood benefits Germany but undermines the fairness of the game.' The incident has reignited debate over VAR's application. Many fans and experts argue that VAR should be more decisive in judging such dangerous plays. Although Pavlovic likely had no malicious intent, the inherent risk of the action warranted a foul call. Germany went on to win the match, but the controversy lingers. The opposing team's coach expressed strong dissatisfaction in the post-match press conference, claiming the decision affected the outcome. FIFA may review the incident after the game. For Germany, while the victory stands, the controversy could cast a shadow over their campaign. Balancing attacking aggression with player safety will be a key challenge for the coaching staff. For football as a whole, this incident serves as a reminder that player protection must always come first. In conclusion, whether Pavlovic's high boot constituted a foul is clear under the laws of the game. However, the on-field judgment of VAR and the referee, and the resulting impact on the match, remain hot topics. Future similar incidents may see stricter enforcement.

Germany goal should have been ruled out for 'endangering opponent'

Related Matches